Paper detail

On the variation in stellar $α$-enhancements of star-forming galaxies in the EAGLE simulation

The ratio of $α$-elements to iron in galaxies holds valuable information about the star formation history since their enrichment occurs on different timescales. The fossil record of stars in galaxies has mostly been excavated for passive galaxies, since the light of star-forming galaxies is dominated by young stars which have much weaker atmospheric absorption features. Here we use the largest reference cosmological simulation of the EAGLE project to investigate the origin of variations in stellar $α$-enhancement among star-forming galaxies at $z=0$, and their impact on integrated spectra. The definition of $α$-enhancement in a composite stellar population is ambiguous. We elucidate two definitions - termed `mean' and `galactic' $α$-enhancement - in more detail. While a star-forming galaxy has a high `mean' $α$-enhancement when its stars formed rapidly, a galaxy with a large `galactic' $α$-enhancement generally had a delayed star formation history. We find that absorption-line strengths of Mg and Fe correlate with variations in $α$-enhancement. These correlations are strongest for the `galactic' $α$-enhancement. However, we show that these are mostly caused by other effects which are cross-correlated with $α$-enhancement, such as variations in the light-weighted age. This severely complicates the retrieval of $α$-enhancements in star-forming galaxies. The ambiguity is not severe for passive galaxies and we confirm that spectral variations in these galaxies are caused by measurable variations in $α$-enhancements. We suggest that this more complex coupling between $α$-enhancement and star formation histories can guide the interpretation of new observations of star-forming galaxies.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.