Paper detail

On the validity of the Euler product inside the critical strip

The Euler product formula relates Dirichlet $L(s,χ)$ functions to an infinite product over primes, and is known to be valid for $\Re (s) >1$, where it converges absolutely. We provide arguments that the formula is actually valid for $\Re (s) > 1/2$ in a specific sense. Namely, the logarithm of the Euler product, although formally divergent, is meaningful because it is Cesàro summable, and its Cesàro average converges to $\log L (s,χ)$. Our argument relies on the prime number theorem, an Abel transform, and a central limit theorem for the Random Walk of the Primes, the series $\sum_{n=1}^N \cos\left(t\log p_n\right)$, and its generalization to other Dirichlet $L$-functions. The significance of ${\Re(s) > 1/2}$ arises from the $\sqrt{N}$ growth of this series, since it satisfies a central limit theorem. $L$-functions based on principal Dirichlet characters, such as the Riemann $ζ$-function, are exceptional due to the pole at $s=1$, and require $\Im (s) \neq 0$ and a truncation of the Euler product. Compelling numerical evidence of this surprising result is presented, and some of its consequences are discussed.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.