Paper detail

On the validation of Newcomb-Benford law and Weibull distribution in neuromuscular transmission

The neuromuscular junction represents a relevant substrate for revealing important biophysical mechanisms of synaptic transmission. In this context, calcium ions are important in the synapse machinery, providing the nervous impulse transmission to the muscle fiber. In this work, we carefully investigated whether intervals of spontaneous electrical activity, recorded in seven different calcium concentrations, conform Newcomb-Benford law. Our analysis revealed that electrical discharge of neuromuscular junction obeys the expected values for Newcomb-Benford law for first and second digits, while first-two digits do not perfectly follows the law. We next examined previous theoretical studies, establishing a relation between the law and lognormal and Weibull distributions. We showed that Weibull distribution is more appropriate to fit the intervals as compared to lognormal distribution. Altogether, the present findings strongly suggest that spontaneous activity is a base-scale invariant phenomenon.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.