Paper detail

On the universality of the split monopole black hole magnetosphere

Black holes can acquire magnetic flux from their magnetized progenitor or via prolonged accretion. We study the evolution of black hole magnetospheres by means of axisymmetric general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations. We show that all simulated initial magnetic field geometries of varying complexity ultimately evolve into a split monopole magnetosphere. The magnetospheric evolution consists of two phases. In the first phase, the magnetosphere evolves toward pressure equilibrium accompanied by a large magnetic flux decrease on the event horizon on a fast Alfvénic timescale of $\sim 60$ light-crossing times of the gravitational radius. The second phase proceeds in a pressure balance in which the magnetic flux decays and current sheets shift in polar angle over the event horizon on slower resistive timescales. We present an analytic model for the second phase. Furthermore, we show that in a split monopole magnetosphere the magnetic flux on the event horizon decays exponentially with a timescale that depends on the black hole spin, where higher spin results in slower decay. Our results can have an implications for the timescales of reconnection-powered flares and for multimessenger counterparts to gravitational wave events.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.