Paper detail

On the Uncertainties of the Central Density in Axisymmetric Galaxies due to Deprojection

The deprojection of the surface brightness of axisymmetric galaxies is indeterminate unless the galaxy is seen edge-on. In practice, this problem is often circumvented by making ad hoc assumptions about the density distribution. However, one can redistribute the density and still project to the same surface brightness. This is similar to adding so-called konus densities to the assumed density distribution. In this paper we investigate the maximum konus density that one can add to elliptical galaxies. In particular we focus on the uncertainties in the central densities of axisymmetric, (cusped) elliptical galaxies due to the non-uniqueness of the deprojection. In order to estimate the dynamical influence of konus densities on the central region, we calculate the mass fraction they can add to the center. We show that this mass fraction is at most a few percent. We also investigate the dynamical effect of cusped konus densities We show that konus densities can only be moderately cusped, and that an increase in cusp slope results in a decrease of the mass fraction added to the center by the konus density. We illustrate all this by the specific example of M32, and show that the uncertainty in the central mass due to deprojection is negligible compared to the inferred mass of the central black hole (BH) in this galaxy.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.