Paper detail

On the Two-user Interference Channel with Lack of Knowledge of the Interference Codebook at one Receiver

In multi-user information theory it is often assumed that every node in the network possesses all codebooks used in the network. This assumption may be impractical in distributed ad-hoc, cognitive or heterogeneous networks. This work considers the two-user Interference Channel with one Oblivious Receiver (IC-OR), i.e., one receiver lacks knowledge of the interfering cookbook while the other receiver knows both codebooks. The paper asks whether, and if so how much, the channel capacity of the IC-OR is reduced compared to that of the classical IC where both receivers know all codebooks. A novel outer bound is derived and shown to be achievable to within a gap for the class of injective semi-deterministic IC-ORs; the gap is shown to be zero for injective fully deterministic IC-ORs. For the linear deterministic IC-OR that models the Gaussian noise channel at high SNR, non i.i.d. Bernoulli(1/2) input bits are shown to achieve points not achievable by i.i.d. Bernoulli(1/2) input bits used in the same achievability scheme. For the real-valued Gaussian IC-OR the gap is shown to be at most 1/2 bit per channel use, even though the set of optimal input distributions for the derived outer bound could not be determined. Towards understanding the Gaussian IC-OR, an achievability strategy is evaluated in which the input alphabets at the non-oblivious transmitter are a mixture of discrete and Gaussian random variables, where the cardinality of the discrete part is appropriately chosen as a function of the channel parameters. Surprisingly, as the oblivious receiver intuitively should not be able to 'jointly decode' the intended and interfering messages (whose codebook is unavailable), it is shown that with this choice of input, the capacity region of the symmetric Gaussian IC-OR is to within 3.34 bits (per channel use per user) of an outer bound for the classical Gaussian IC with full codebook knowledge.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.