Paper detail

On the Transition from the Quantum to the Classical Regime for Massive Scalar Particles: A Spatiotemporal Approach

(abridged)If the space-time is presupposed, the coordinate representation of the solutions $ψ(\vec x, t)$ of the Schroedinger equation of a quantum system containing one massive scalar particle has a {\it preferred status}. It is then possible to perform a multipolar expansion of the density matrix $ρ(\vec x, t) = |ψ(\vec x, t)|^2$ (and more generally of the Wigner function) around a space-time trajectory ${\vec x}_c(t)$ to be properly selected. A special set of solutions $ψ_{EMWF}(\vec x, t)$, named {\it Ehrenfest monopole wave functions}(EMWF), is characterized by the conditions that: (i) the quantum expectation value of the position operator coincides at any time with the searched classical trajectory, $< ψ_{EMWF} | {\hat {\vec x}} | ψ_{EMWF}> = {\vec x}_c(t)$: this is possible only when the dipole vanishes; (ii) Ehrenfest's theorem holds for the expectation values of the position and momentum operator: its application to EMWF leads then to a {\it closed Newton equation of motion for the classical trajectory, where the effective force is the Newton force plus non-Newtonian terms (of order $\hbar^2$ or higher) depending on the higher multipoles of the probability distribution $ρ$.} These results can be extended to N particle systems and to relativistic quantum mechanics. There is substantial agreement with Bohr's viewpoint: the macroscopic description of the preparation, certain intermediate steps and the detection of the final outcome of experiments involving massive particles are dominated by these 'classical {\it effective} trajectories'. In the framework of decoherence, one gets a transition from an {\it improper quantum} mixture to a {\it classical statistical} one, when both the particle and the pointer wave functions appearing in the reduced density matrix are EMWF.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.