Paper detail

On the tractability of optimization problems on H-graphs

For a graph $H$, a graph $G$ is an $H$-graph if it is an intersection graph of connected subgraphs of some subdivision of $H$. $H$-graphs naturally generalize several important graph classes like interval or circular-arc graph. This class was introduced in the early 1990s by Bíró, Hujter, and Tuza. Recently, Chaplick et al. initiated the algorithmic study of $H$-graphs by showing that a number of fundamental optimization problems are solvable in polynomial time on $H$-graphs. We extend and complement these algorithmic findings in several directions. First we show that for every fixed $H$, the class of $H$-graphs is of logarithmically-bounded boolean-width (via mim-width). Pipelined with the plethora of known algorithms on graphs of bounded boolean-width, this describes a large class of problems solvable in polynomial time on $H$-graphs. We also observe that $H$-graphs are graphs with polynomially many minimal separators. Combined with the work of Fomin, Todinca and Villanger on algorithmic properties of such classes of graphs, this identify another wide class of problems solvable in polynomial time on $H$-graphs. The most fundamental optimization problems among the problems solvable in polynomial time on $H$-graphs are Maximum Clique, Maximum Independent Set, and Minimum Dominating Set. We provide a more refined complexity analysis of these problems from the perspective of Parameterized Complexity. We show that Maximum Independent Set and Minimum Dominating Set are W[1]-hard being parameterized by the size of $H$ plus the size of the solution. On the other hand, we prove that when $H$ is a tree, then Minimum Dominating Set is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized (FPT) by the size of $H$. For Maximum Clique we show that it admits a polynomial kernel parameterized by $H$ and the solution size.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.