Paper detail

On the total energy conservation of the Alcubierre spacetime

In this article, we consider the Alcubierre spacetime, such a spacetime describes a ``bubble'' that propagates with arbitrary global velocity. This setting allows movement at a speed greater than that of light. There are some known problems with this metric, e.g., the source's negative energy and the violation of the source's energy conservation when the bubble accelerates. We address these two issues within the realm of the Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity (TEGR). The energy conservation problem can be solved when considering the energy of the gravitational field itself. The total energy of the spacetime, gravitational plus source, is conserved even in accelerated motion. We explicitly show the dependence of energy and gravitational energy flux on the frame of reference, one adapted to a static observer and the other to a free-falling one in the same coordinate system. Addressing the problem of energy negativity of the source, we find that a static observer measures positive energy of the source, while an Eulerian observer measures a negative one. Thus, we surmise that negative energy may be a reference problem.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.