Paper detail

On the time for a runner to get lonely

The Lonely Runner Conjecture asserts that if $n$ runners with distinct constant speeds run on the unit circle $\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}$ starting from $0$ at time $0$, then each runner will at some time $t>0$ be lonely in the sense that she/he will be separated by a distance at least $1/n$ from all the others at time $t$. In investigating the size of $t$, we show that an upper bound for $t$ in terms of a certain number of rounds (which, in the case where the lonely runner is static, corresponds to the number of rounds of the slowest non-static runner) is equivalent to a covering problem in dimension $n-2$. We formulate a conjecture regarding this covering problem and prove it to be true for $n=3,4,5,6$. Then, we use our method of proof to demonstrate that the Lonely Runner Conjecture with Free Starting Positions is satisfied for $n=3,4$. Finally, we show that the so-called gap of loneliness in one round (with respect to the Lonely Runner Conjecture), where we have $m+1$ runners including one static runner, is bounded from below by $1/(2m-1)$ for all integer $m\geq 2$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.