Paper detail

On the threshold of 1/2 order subharmonic emissions in the oscillations of ultrasonically excited bubbles

The pressure threshold for 1/2 order subharmonic (SH) emissions and period doubling during the oscillations of ultrasonically excited bubbles is thought to be minimum when the bubble is sonicated with twice its resonance frequency (fr). This estimate is based on studies that simplified or neglected the effects of thermal damping. In this work, the nonlinear dynamics of ultrasonically excited bubbles is investigated accounting for the thermal dissipation. Results are visualized using bifurcation diagrams as a function of pressure. Here we show that, and depending on the gas, the pressure threshold for 1/2 order SHs can be minimum at a frequency between 0.5fr<f<0.6fr. In this frequency range, the generation of 1/2 order SHs are due to the occurrence of 5/2 order ultra-harmonic resonance. The stability of such oscillations are size dependent. For an air bubble immersed in water, only bubbles bigger than 1 microns in diameter are able to emit non-destructive SHs in these frequency ranges.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.