Paper detail

On the three graph invariants related to matching of finite simple graphs

Let $G$ be a finite simple graph on the vertex set $V(G)$ and let $\text{ind-match}(G)$, $\text{min-match}(G)$ and $\text{match}(G)$ denote the induced matching number, the minimum matching number and the matching number of $G$, respectively. It is known that the inequalities $\text{ind-match}(G) \leq \text{min-match}(G) \leq \text{match}(G) \leq 2\text{min-match}(G)$ and $\text{match}(G) \leq \left\lfloor |V(G)|/2 \right\rfloor$ hold in general. In the present paper, we determine the possible tuples $(p, q, r, n)$ with $\text{ind-match}(G) = p$, $\text{min-match}(G) = q$, $\text{match}(G) = r$ and $|V(G)| = n$ arising from connected simple graphs. As an application of this result, we also determine the possible tuples $(p', q, r, n)$ with ${\rm{reg}}(G) = p'$, $\text{min-match}(G) = q$, $\text{match}(G) = r$ and $|V(G)| = n$ arising from connected simple graphs, where $I(G)$ is the edge ideal of $G$ and ${\rm{reg}}(G) = {\rm{reg}}(K[V(G)]/I(G))$ is the Castelnuovo--Mumford regularity of the quotient ring $K[V(G)]/I(G)$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.