Paper detail

On the Thermodynamics of NUT charged spaces

We discuss and compare at length the results of two methods used recently to describe the thermodynamics of Taub-NUT solutions in a deSitter background. In the first approach ($\mathbb{% C}$-approach), one deals with an analytically continued version of the metric while in the second approach ($\mathbb{R}$-approach), the discussion is carried out using the unmodified metric with Lorentzian signature. No analytic continuation is performed on the coordinates and/or the parameters that appear in the metric. We find that the results of both these approaches are completely equivalent modulo analytic continuation and we provide the exact prescription that relates the results in both methods. The extension of these results to the AdS/flat cases aims to give a physical interpretation of the thermodynamics of nut-charged spacetimes in the Lorentzian sector. We also briefly discuss the higher dimensional spaces and note that, analogous with the absence of hyperbolic nuts in AdS backgrounds, there are no spherical Taub-Nut-dS solutions.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.