Paper detail

On the thermodynamic self-similarity of the nearest, most relaxed, giant ellipticals

We present detailed spatially resolved measurements of the thermodynamic properties of the X-ray emitting gas in the inner regions of the five nearest, X-ray and optically brightest, and most X-ray morphologically relaxed giant elliptical galaxies known. Beyond the innermost region at r > 1 kpc, and out to r ~ 6 kpc, the density, pressure, entropy, and cooling time distributions for the X-ray emitting gas follow remarkably similar, simple, power-law like distributions. Notably, the entropy profiles follow a power-law form, with an index 0.92-1.07. The cumulative hot X-ray emitting gas mass profiles and the gas-mass to stellar-light ratios of all five galaxies are also similar. Overall the observed similarity of the thermodynamic profiles in this radial range argues that, in these systems, relativistic jets heat the gas at a similar rate averaged over time scales longer than the cooling time of 10^8 yr. These jets are powered by accretion from the hot gas, or material entrained within it, onto the central super-massive black hole. This jet heating creates an energy balance where heating and cooling are in equilibrium, keeping the hot galactic atmospheres in a `steady-state'. Within r < 1 kpc, this similarity breaks down: the observed entropy profiles show well resolved flattening and the values differ from system to system substantially. The accretion rate onto the black hole and the AGN activity, heating the interstellar medium, must therefore vary significantly on time scales shorter than the cooling time of 10^7 - 10^8 yr.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.