Paper detail

On the Theorem of Uniform Recovery of Random Sampling Matrices

We consider two theorems from the theory of compressive sensing. Mainly a theorem concerning uniform recovery of random sampling matrices, where the number of samples needed in order to recover an $s$-sparse signal from linear measurements (with high probability) is known to be $m\gtrsim s(\ln s)^3\ln N$. We present new and improved constants together with what we consider to be a more explicit proof. A proof that also allows for a slightly larger class of $m\times N$-matrices, by considering what we call \emph{low entropy}. We also present an improved condition on the so-called restricted isometry constants, $δ_s$, ensuring sparse recovery via $\ell^1$-minimization. We show that $δ_{2s}<4/\sqrt{41}$ is sufficient and that this can be improved further to almost allow for a sufficient condition of the type $δ_{2s}<2/3$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.