Paper detail

On The Synergy Between Nonconvex Extensions of The Tensor Nuclear Norm for Tensor Recovery

Low-rank tensor recovery has attracted much attention among various tensor recovery approaches. A tensor rank has several definitions, unlike the matrix rank--e.g. the CP rank and the Tucker rank. Many low-rank tensor recovery methods are focused on the Tucker rank. Since the Tucker rank is nonconvex and discontinuous, many relaxations of the Tucker rank have been proposed, e.g., the tensor nuclear norm, weighted tensor nuclear norm, and weighted tensor Schatten-$p$ norm. In particular, the weighted tensor Schatten-p norm has two parameters, the weight and $p$, and the tensor nuclear norm and weighted tensor nuclear norm are special cases of these parameters. However, there has been no detailed discussion of whether the effects of the weighting and $p$ are synergistic. In this paper, we propose a novel low-rank tensor completion model using the weighted tensor Schatten-$p$ norm to reveal the relationships between the weight and $p$. To clarify whether complex methods such as the weighted tensor Schatten-$p$ norm are necessary, we compare them with a simple method using rank-constrained minimization. It was found that the simple methods did not outperform the complex methods unless the rank of the original tensor could be accurately known. If we can obtain the ideal weight, $p = 1$ is sufficient, although it is necessary to set $p<1$ when using the weights obtained from observations. These results are consistent with existing reports.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.