Paper detail

On the Super-Earths locked in the 3:2 mean-motion resonance

The first study of migration-induced resonances in a pair of Earth-like planets has been performed by Papaloizou and Szuszkiewicz (2005). They concluded that in the case of disparate masses embedded in a disc with the surface density expected for a minimum mass solar nebula at 5.2 au, the most likely resonances are ratios of large integers, such as 8:7. For equal masses, planets tend to enter into the 2:1 or 3:2 resonance. In Papaloizou and Szuszkiewicz (2005) the two low-mass planets have masses equal to 4 Earth masses, chosen to mimic the very well known example of two pulsar planets which are close to the 3:2 resonance. That study has stimulated quite a few interesting questions. One of them is considered here, namely how the behaviour of the plan- ets close to the mean-motion resonance depends on the actual values of the masses of the planets. We have chosen a 3:2 commensurability and investigated the outcome of an orbital migration in the vicinity of this resonance in the case of a pair of equal mass super-Earths, whose mass is either 5 or 8 Earth masses.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.