Paper detail

On the sum of $L1$ influences

For a function $f$ over the discrete cube, the total $L_1$ influence of $f$ is defined as $\sum_{i=1}^n \|\partial_i f\|_1$, where $\partial_i f$ denotes the discrete derivative of $f$ in the direction $i$. In this work, we show that the total $L_1$ influence of a $[-1,1]$-valued function $f$ can be upper bounded by a polynomial in the degree of $f$, resolving affirmatively an open problem of Aaronson and Ambainis (ITCS 2011). The main challenge here is that the $L_1$ influences do not admit an easy Fourier analytic representation. In our proof, we overcome this problem by introducing a new analytic quantity $\mathcal I_p(f)$, relating this new quantity to the total $L_1$ influence of $f$. This new quantity, which roughly corresponds to an average of the total $L_1$ influences of some ensemble of functions related to $f$, has the benefit of being much easier to analyze, allowing us to resolve the problem of Aaronson and Ambainis. We also give an application of the theorem to graph theory, and discuss the connection between the study of bounded functions over the cube and the quantum query complexity of partial functions where Aaronson and Ambainis encountered this question.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.