Paper detail

On the subdivision algebra for the polytope $\mathcal{U}_{I,\bar{J}}$

The polytopes $\mathcal{U}_{I,\bar{J}}$ were introduced by Ceballos, Padrol, and Sarmiento to provide a geometric approach to the study of $(I,\bar{J})$-Tamari lattices. They observed a connection between certain $\mathcal{U}_{I,\bar{J}}$ and acyclic root polytopes, and wondered if Mészáros' subdivision algebra can be used to subdivide all $\mathcal{U}_{I,\bar{J}}$. We answer this in the affirmative from two perspectives, one using flow polytopes and the other using root polytopes. We show that $\mathcal{U}_{I,\bar{J}}$ is integrally equivalent to a flow polytope that can be subdivided using the subdivision algebra. Alternatively, we find a suitable projection of $\mathcal{U}_{I,\bar{J}}$ to an acyclic root polytope which allows subdivisions of the root polytope to be lifted back to $\mathcal{U}_{I,\bar{J}}$. As a consequence, this implies that subdivisions of $\mathcal{U}_{I,\bar{J}}$ can be obtained with the algebraic interpretation of using reduced forms of monomials in the subdivision algebra. In addition, we show that the $(I,\bar{J})$-Tamari complex can be obtained as a triangulated flow polytope.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.