Paper detail

On the structure of the new particle at 126 GeV (Higgs- or not Higgs-boson?)

A new particle - discovered recently with the Atlas and CMS detectors at LHC - has been interpreted as the long sought Higgs-boson. A corresponding scalar field is needed to make the weak interaction gauge invariant and to understand the quark masses in the Standard Model. However, the Standard Model is an effective theory with quark masses, which can be understood only in a fundamental theory. Such a theory has been constructed, based on a generalised second order extension of QED, in which the quarks can be understood as effective fermions with masses given by binding energies in a boson-exchange potential. In the present approach the Higgs-mechanism is not needed. In this framework a good understanding of particles in the "top" regime is obtained. Two J^π=1^- q-qbar states are predicted, identified with Z(91.2 GeV) and the t-tbar state at about 350 GeV. Further, two 0^+ q-qbar states are obtained, one with a mass consistent with that of the new particle, the other with a mass of about 41 GeV. A detection of the second scalar state will serve as a crucial test of the present model.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.