Paper detail

On the structure of self-complementary graphs

A \emph{self-complementary} graph is a graph isomorphic to its complement. An isomorphism between $G$ and its complement, viewed as a permutation of $V(G)$, is then called an \emph{antimorphism}. A \emph{skew partition} of $G$ is a partition of $V(G)$ into 4 sets $A,B,C,D$ such that there is no edge between $A,B$ and every possible edge between $C,D$. A \emph{symmetric partition} of $G$ is a partition of $V(G)$ into 4 sets $A,B,C,D$ such that there is no edge between $A, D$, no edge between $B, C$, every possible edge between $A,B$ and every possible edge between $C,D$. We give a new proof of a theorem of Gibbs saying that every self-complementary graph on $4k$ vertices has $k$ disjoint paths on 4 vertices as induced subgraph. This new proof gives more structural information than the original one. We conjecture that every self-complementary graph on $4k$ vertices either has an induced cycle on 5 vertices, or a skew partition, or a symmetric partition. The new proof of Gibb's theorem yields a proof of the conjecture for the self-complementary graphs that have an antimorphism that is the product of a two circular permutations, one of them of length 4.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.