Paper detail

On the Structure of Quintic Polynomials

We study the structure of bounded degree polynomials over finite fields. Haramaty and Shpilka [STOC 2010] showed that biased degree three or four polynomials admit a strong structural property. We confirm that this is the case for degree five polynomials also. Let $\mathbb{F}=\mathbb{F}_q$ be a prime field. [1.] Suppose $f:\mathbb{F}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{F}$ is a degree five polynomial with bias(f)=δ. Then f can be written in the form $f= \sum_{i=1}^{c} G_i H_i + Q$, where $G_i$ and $H_i$s are nonconstant polynomials satisfying $deg(G_i)+deg(H_i)\leq 5$ and $Q$ is a degree $\leq 4$ polynomial. Moreover, $c=c(δ)$ does not depend on $n$ and $q$. [2.] Suppose $f:\mathbb{F}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{F}$ is a degree five polynomial with $bias(f)=δ$. Then there exists an $Ω_δ(n)$ dimensional affine subspace $V$ of $\mathbb{F}^n$ such that $f$ restricted to $V$ is a constant. Cohen and Tal [Random 2015] proved that biased polynomials of degree at most four are constant on a subspace of dimension $Ω(n)$. Item [2.] extends this to degree five polynomials. A corollary to Item [2.] is that any degree five affine disperser for dimension $k$ is also an affine extractor for dimension $O(k)$. We note that Item [2.] cannot hold for degrees six or higher. We obtain our results for degree five polynomials as a special case of structure theorems that we prove for biased degree d polynomials when $d<|\mathbb{F}|+4$. While the $d<|\mathbb{F}|+4$ assumption seems very restrictive, we note that prior to our work such structure theorems were only known for $d<|\mathbb{F}|$ by Green and Tao [Contrib. Discrete Math. 2009] and Bhowmick and Lovett [arXiv:1506.02047]. Using algorithmic regularity lemmas for polynomials developed by Bhattacharyya, et. al. [SODA 2015], we show that whenever such a strong structure exists, it can be found algorithmically in time polynomial in n.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.