Paper detail

On the strong Lefschetz question for uniform powers of general linear forms in $k[x,y,z]$

Schenck and Seceleanu proved that if $R = k[x,y,z]$, where $k$ is an infinite field, and $I$ is an ideal generated by any collection of powers of linear forms, then multiplication by a general linear form $L$ induces a homomorphism of maximal rank from any component of $R/I$ to the next. That is, $R/I$ has the {\em weak Lefschetz property}. Considering the more general {\em strong Lefschetz question} of when $\times L^j$ has maximal rank for $j \geq 2$, we give the first systematic study of this problem. We assume that the linear forms are general and that the powers are all the same, i.e. that $I$ is generated by {\em uniform} powers of general linear forms. We prove that for any number of such generators, $\times L^2$ always has maximal rank. We then specialize to almost complete intersections, i.e. to four generators, and we show that for $j = 3,4,5$ the behavior depends on the uniform exponent and on $j$, in a way that we make precise. In particular, there is always at most one degree where $\times L^j$ fails maximal rank. Finally, we note that experimentally all higher powers of $L$ fail maximal rank in at least two degrees.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.