Paper detail

On the strength of weak compactness

We study the logical and computational strength of weak compactness in the separable Hilbert space \ell_2. Let weak-BW be the statement the every bounded sequence in \ell_2 has a weak cluster point. It is known that weak-BW is equivalent to ACA_0 over RCA_0 and thus that it is equivalent to (nested uses of) the usual Bolzano-Weierstraß principle BW. We show that weak-BW is instance-wise equivalent to the Π^0_2-CA. This means that for each Π^0_2 sentence A(n) there is a sequence (x_i) in \ell_2, such that one can define the comprehension functions for A(n) recursively in a cluster point of (x_i). As consequence we obtain that the Turing degrees d > 0" are exactly those degrees that contain a weak cluster point of any computable, bounded sequence in \ell_2. Since a cluster point of any sequence in the unit interval [0,1] can be computed in a degree low over 0', this show also that instances of weak-BW are strictly stronger than instances of BW. We also comment on the strength of weak-BW in the context of abstract Hilbert spaces in the sense of Kohlenbach and show that his construction of a solution for the functional interpretation of weak compactness is optimal.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.