Paper detail

On the Statistical Analysis of Practical SPARQL Queries

In this paper, we analyze some basic features of SPARQL queries coming from our practical world in a statistical way. These features include three statistic features such as the occurrence frequency of triple patterns, fragments, well-designed patterns and four semantic features such as monotonicity, non-monotonicity, weak monotonicity (old solutions are still served as parts of new solutions when some new triples are added) and satisfiability. All these features contribute to characterize SPARQL queries in different dimensions. We hope that this statistical analysis would provide some useful observation for researchers and engineers who are interested in what practical SPARQL queries look like, so that they could develop some practical heuristics for processing SPARQL queries and build SPARQL query processing engines and benchmarks. Besides, they can narrow the scope of their problems by avoiding those cases that do possibly not happen in our practical world.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.