Paper detail

On the Star Formation Efficiency of Turbulent Magnetized Clouds

We study the star formation efficiency (SFE) in simulations and observations of turbulent, magnetized, molecular clouds. We find that the probability density functions (PDFs) of the density and the column density in our simulations with solenoidal, mixed, and compressive forcing of the turbulence, sonic Mach numbers of 3-50, and magnetic fields in the super- to the trans-Alfvenic regime, all develop power-law tails of flattening slope with increasing SFE. The high-density tails of the PDFs are consistent with equivalent radial density profiles, rho ~ r^(-kappa) with kappa ~ 1.5-2.5, in agreement with observations. Studying velocity-size scalings, we find that all the simulations are consistent with the observed v ~ l^(1/2) scaling of supersonic turbulence, and seem to approach Kolmogorov turbulence with v ~ l^(1/3) below the sonic scale. The velocity-size scaling is, however, largely independent of the SFE. In contrast, the density-size and column density-size scalings are highly sensitive to star formation. We find that the power-law slope alpha of the density power spectrum, P(rho,k) ~ k^alpha, or equivalently the Delta-variance spectrum of column density, DV(Sigma,l) ~ l^(-alpha), switches sign from alpha < 0 for SFE ~ 0 to alpha > 0 when star formation proceeds (SFE > 0). We provide a relation to compute the SFE from a measurement of alpha. Studying the literature, we find values ranging from alpha = -1.6 to +1.6 in observations covering scales from the large-scale atomic medium, over cold molecular clouds, down to dense star-forming cores. From those alpha values, we infer SFEs and find good agreement with independent measurements based on young stellar object (YSO) counts, where available. Our SFE-alpha relation provides an independent estimate of the SFE based on the column density map of a cloud alone, without requiring a priori knowledge of star-formation activity or YSO counts.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.