Paper detail

On the stable recovery of the sparsest overcomplete representations in presence of noise

Let x be a signal to be sparsely decomposed over a redundant dictionary A, i.e., a sparse coefficient vector s has to be found such that x=As. It is known that this problem is inherently unstable against noise, and to overcome this instability, the authors of [Stable Recovery; Donoho et.al., 2006] have proposed to use an "approximate" decomposition, that is, a decomposition satisfying ||x - A s|| < δ, rather than satisfying the exact equality x = As. Then, they have shown that if there is a decomposition with ||s||_0 < (1+M^{-1})/2, where M denotes the coherence of the dictionary, this decomposition would be stable against noise. On the other hand, it is known that a sparse decomposition with ||s||_0 < spark(A)/2 is unique. In other words, although a decomposition with ||s||_0 < spark(A)/2 is unique, its stability against noise has been proved only for highly more restrictive decompositions satisfying ||s||_0 < (1+M^{-1})/2, because usually (1+M^{-1})/2 << spark(A)/2. This limitation maybe had not been very important before, because ||s||_0 < (1+M^{-1})/2 is also the bound which guaranties that the sparse decomposition can be found via minimizing the L1 norm, a classic approach for sparse decomposition. However, with the availability of new algorithms for sparse decomposition, namely SL0 and Robust-SL0, it would be important to know whether or not unique sparse decompositions with (1+M^{-1})/2 < ||s||_0 < spark(A)/2 are stable. In this paper, we show that such decompositions are indeed stable. In other words, we extend the stability bound from ||s||_0 < (1+M^{-1})/2 to the whole uniqueness range ||s||_0 < spark(A)/2. In summary, we show that "all unique sparse decompositions are stably recoverable". Moreover, we see that sparser decompositions are "more stable".

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.