Paper detail

On the stability of non-isothermal Bonnor-Ebert spheres. II. The effect of gas temperature on the stability

Aims. We investigate the stability of non-isothermal Bonnor-Ebert spheres with a model that includes a self-consistent calculation of the gas temperature. This way we can discard the assumption of equality between the dust and gas temperatures, and study the stability as the gas temperature changes with chemical evolution of the gas. Methods. We use a gas-grain chemical model including a time-dependent treatment of depletion onto grain surfaces, which strongly influences the gas temperature as the main coolant, CO, depletes from the gas. Dust and gas temperatures are solved with radiative transfer. For comparison with previous work, we assume that the cores are deeply embedded in a larger external structure, corresponding to visual extinction $A_{\rm V}^{\rm ext}=10$ mag. Results. We find that the critical non-dimensional radius $ξ_1$ derived here is similar to our previous work where we assumed $T_{\rm dust}=T_{\rm gas}$; the $ξ_1$ values lie below the isothermal critical value $ξ_0\sim6.45$, but the difference is less than 10%. Chemical evolution does not affect notably the stability condition of low-mass cores (<0.75 $M_\odot$). For higher masses the decrease of cooling owing to CO depletion causes substantial temporal changes in the temperature and density profiles of the cores. In the mass range 1-2 $M_\odot$ , $ξ_1$ decreases with chemical evolution, whereas above 3 $M_\odot$ , $ξ_1$ instead increases. We also find that decreasing $A_{\rm V}^{\rm ext}$ increases the gas temperature especially when the gas is chemically old, causing $ξ_1$ to increase with respect to models with higher $A_{\rm V}^{\rm ext}$. The derived $ξ_1$ values are close to $ξ_0$. The density contrast between the core center and edge varies between 8 to 16 depending on core mass and the chemical age of the gas, compared to the constant value $\sim$ 14.1 for the isothermal BES.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.