Paper detail

On the stability of non-isothermal Bonnor-Ebert spheres

Aims: We aim to derive a stability condition for non-isothermal Bonnor-Ebert spheres and compare the physical properties of critical non-isothermal and isothermal gas spheres. These configurations can serve as models for prestellar cores before gravitational collapse. Methods: A stability condition for non-isothermal spheres is derived by constructing an expression for the derivative of boundary pressure with respect to core volume. The temperature distribution is determined by means of radiative transfer calculations. Based on the stability analysis, we derive the physical parameters of critical cores for the mass range 0.1 - 5.0 M_sun. In addition, the properties of roughly Jupiter-mass cores are briefly examined. Results: At the low-mass end the critical non-isothermal sphere has lower central density and a slightly larger physical radius than the corresponding isothermal sphere (i.e. one with the same mass and average temperature). The temperature decrease towards the core centre becomes steeper towards smaller masses as the central density becomes higher. The slope depends on the adopted dust model. We find that the critical dimensionless radius increases above the isothermal value xi_0 = 6.45 for very low-mass cores (< 0.2 M_sun). However, in the mass-range studied here the changes are within 5% from the isothermal value. Conclusions: The density structures of non-isothermal and isothermal Bonnor-Ebert spheres for a given mass are fairly similar. However, the present models predict clear differences in the average temperatures for the same physical radius. Especially for low-mass cores, the temperature gradient probably has implications on the chemistry and the observed line emission. We also find that hydrostatic Jupiter-mass cores with radii less than 100 AU would have very high boundary pressures compared with typical pressures in the interstellar space.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.