Paper detail

On the stability of a class of non-monotonic systems of parallel queues

We investigate, under general stationary ergodic assumptions, the stability of systems of $S$ parallel queues in which any incoming customer joins the queue of the server having the $p+1$-th shortest workload ($p < S$), or a free server if any. This change in the allocation policy makes the analysis much more challenging with respect to the classical FCFS model with $S$ servers, as it leads to the non-monotonicity of the underlying stochastic recursion. We provide sufficient conditions of existence of a stationary workload, which indicate a "splitting" of the system in heavy traffic, into a loss system of $p$ servers plus a FCFS system of $S-p$ servers. To prove this result, we show {\em en route} an original sufficient condition for existence and uniqueness of a stationary workload for a multiple-server loss system.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.