Paper detail

On the splitting problem for Lorentzian manifolds with an $\mathbb{R}$-action with causal orbits

We study the interplay between the global causal and geometric structures of a spacetime $(M,g)$ and the features of a given smooth $\mathbb{R}$-action $ρ$ on $M$ whose orbits are all causal curves, building on classic results about Lie group actions on manifolds described by Palais. In the first part of this paper, we prove that $ρ$ is free and proper (so that $M$ splits topologically) provided that $(M,g)$ is strongly causal and $ρ$ does not have what we call weakly ancestral pairs, a notion which admits a natural interpretation in terms of "cosmic censorship". Accordingly, such condition holds automatically if $(M,g)$ is globally hyperbolic. We also prove that $M$ splits topologically if $(M,g)$ is strongly causal and $ρ$ is the flow of a complete conformal Killing causal vector field. In the second part, we investigate the class of Brinkmann spacetimes, which can be regarded as null analogues of stationary spacetimes in which $ρ$ is the flow of a complete parallel null vector field. Inspired by the geometric characterization of stationary spacetimes in terms of standard stationary ones [24], we obtain an analogous geometric characterization of when a Brinkmann spacetime is isometric to a standard Brinkmann spacetime. This result naturally leads us to discuss a conjectural null analogue for Ricci-flat $4$-dimensional Brinkmann spacetimes of a celebrated rigidity theorem by Anderson [1], and highlight its relation with a long-standing 1962 conjecture by Ehlers and Kundt [13]. If true, our conjecture provides strong mathematical support to the idea that gravitational plane waves are the most natural "boundary conditions" at infinity for vacuum solutions of the Einstein equation modeling regions outside gravitationally radiating sources.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.