Paper detail

On the spin-down mechanism of the X-ray pulsar 4U 2206+54

Observations of the X-ray pulsar 4U 2206+54, performed over a 15-year span, show its period, which is now 5555 \pm 9 s, to increase drastically. Such behavior of the pulsar can be hardly explained in the frame of traditional scenarios of spin evolution of compact stars. The observed spin-down rate of the neutron star in 4U 2206+54 proves to be in good agreement with the value expected within magnetic accretion scenario which takes into account that magnetic field of the accretion stream can under certain conditions affect its geometry and type of flow. The neutron star in this case accretes material from a dense gaseous slab with small angular momentum which is kept in equilibrium by the magnetic field of the flow itself. The magnetic accretion scenario can be realized in 4U 2206+54 provided the magnetic field strength on the surface of the optical counterpart to the neutron star is in excess of 70 G. The magnetic field strength on the surface of the neutron star in the frame of this scenario turns out to be 4 x 10^{12} G which is in accordance with estimates of this parameter from the analysis of X-ray spectra of the pulsar.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.