Paper detail

On the Spectrum of Dense Random Geometric Graphs

In this paper we study the spectrum of the random geometric graph $G(n,r)$, in a regime where the graph is dense and highly connected. In the \erdren $G(n,p)$ random graph it is well known that upon connectivity the spectrum of the normalized graph Laplacian is concentrated around $1$. We show that such concentration does not occur in the $G(n,r)$ case, even when the graph is dense and almost a complete graph. In particular, we show that the limiting spectral gap is strictly smaller than $1$. In the special case where the vertices are distributed uniformly in the unit cube and $r=1$, we show that for every $0\le k \le d$ there are at least $\binom{d}{k}$ eigenvalues near $1-2^{-k}$, and the limiting spectral gap is exactly $1/2$. We also show that the corresponding eigenfunctions in this case are tightly related to the geometric configuration of the points.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.