Paper detail

On the solidity parameter in canopy flows

We have performed high-fidelity simulations of turbulent open-channel flows over submerged rigid canopies made of cylindrical filaments of fixed length $l=0.25H$ ($H$ being the domain depth) mounted on the wall with an angle of inclination $θ$. The inclination is the free parameter that sets the density of the canopy by varying its frontal area. The density of the canopy, based on the solidity parameter $λ$, is a widely accepted criterion defining the ongoing canopy flow regime, with low values ($λ\ll 0.1$) indicating the sparse regime, and higher values ($λ> 0.1$) the dense regime. All the numerical predictions have been obtained considering the same nominal bulk Reynolds number (i.e. $Re_b=U_b H/ν= 6000$). We consider nine configurations of canopies, with $θ$ varying symmetrically around $0°$ in the range $θ\in [\pm 78.5°]$, where positive angles define canopies inclined in the flow direction (with the grain) and $θ=0°$ corresponds to the wall-normally mounted canopy. The study compares canopies with identical solidity obtained inclining the filaments in opposite angles and assesses the efficacy of the solidity as a representative parameter. It is found that when the canopy is inclined, the actual flow regime differs substantially from the one of a straight canopy that shares the same solidity indicating that criteria solely based on this parameter are not robust. Finally, a new phenomenological model describing the interaction between the coherent structures populating the canopy region and the outer flow is given.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.