Paper detail

On the Sodium versus Iron Correlation in Late B-Type Stars

With an aim to study whether the close correlation between [Na/H] and [Fe/H] recently found in A-type stars further persists in the regime of B-type stars, the abundances of Na were determined for 30 selected sharp-lined late B-type stars (10000K < T_eff < 14000K) from the Na I 5890/5896 doublet. These Na abundances were then compared with the O and Fe abundances (derived from the O I 6156-8 and Fe II 6147/6149 lines) showing anti-correlated peculiarities. It turned out that, unlike the case of A-type stars, [Na/H] is roughly constant at a slightly subsolar level ([Na/H] ~ -0.2 (+/-0.2)) without any significant correlation with [Fe/H] which shows considerable dispersion ranging from ~ -0.6 to ~ +1.0. This may serve as an important observational constraint for understanding the abundance peculiarities along with the physical mechanism of atomic diffusion in upper main-sequence stars of late A through late B-type including Am and HgMn stars.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.