Paper detail

On the size of lattice simplices with a single interior lattice point

Let $\mathcal{T}^d(1)$ be the set of all $d$-dimensional simplices $T$ in $\real^d$ with integer vertices and a single integer point in the interior of $T$. It follows from a result of Hensley that $\mathcal{T}^d(1)$ is finite up to affine transformations that preserve $\mathbb{Z}^d$. It is known that, when $d$ grows, the maximum volume of the simplices $T \in \cT^d(1)$ becomes extremely large. We improve and refine bounds on the size of $T \in \mathcal{T}^d(1)$ (where by the size we mean the volume or the number of lattice points). It is shown that each $T \in \mathcal{T}^d(1)$ can be decomposed into an ascending chain of faces whose sizes are `not too large'. More precisely, if $T \in \mathcal{T}^d(1)$, then there exist faces $G_1 \subseteq ... \subseteq G_d=T$ of $T$ such that, for every $i \in \{1,...,d\}$, $G_i$ is $i$-dimensional and the size of $G_i$ is bounded from above in terms of $i$ and $d$. The bound on the size of $G_i$ is double exponential in $i$. The presented upper bounds are asymptotically tight on the log-log scale.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.