Paper detail

On the size-consistency of the reduced-density-matrix method and the unitary invariant diagonal $N$-representability conditions

Variational calculation of the ground state energy and its properties using the second-order reduced density matrix (2-RDM) is a promising approach for quantum chemistry. A major obstacle with this approach is that the $N$-representability conditions are too difficult in general. Therefore, we usually employ some approximations such as the $P$, $Q$, $G$, $T1$ and $T2^\prime$ conditions, for realistic calculations. The results of using these approximations and conditions in 2-RDM are comparable to those of CCSD(T). However, these conditions do not incorporate an important property; size-consistency. Size-consistency requires that energies $E(A)$, $E(B)$ and $E(A...B)$ for two infinitely separated systems $A$, $B$, and their respective combined system $A...B$, to satisfy $E(A...B) = E(A) + E(B)$. In this study, we show that the size-consistency can be satisfied if 2-RDM satisfies the following conditions: (i) 2-RDM is unitary invariant diagonal $N$-representable; (ii) 2-RDM corresponding to each subsystem is the eigenstate of the number of corresponding electrons; and (iii) 2-RDM satisfies at least one of the $ P$, $Q$, $G$, $T1$ and $T2^\prime$ conditions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.