Paper detail

On the sensitivity of the D parameter to new physics

Measurements of angular correlations in nuclear beta decay are important tests of the Standard Model (SM). Among those, the so-called D correlation parameter occupies a particular place because it is odd under time reversal, and because the experimental sensitivity is at the $10^{-4}$ level, with plans of further improvement in the near future. Using effective field theory~(EFT) techniques, we reassess its potential to discover or constrain new physics beyond the SM. We provide a comprehensive classification of CP-violating EFT scenarios which generate a shift of the D parameter away from the SM prediction. We show that, in each scenario, a shift larger than $10^{-5}$ is in serious tension with the existing experimental data, where bounds coming from electric dipole moments and LHC observables play a decisive role. The tension can only be avoided by fine tuning of the parameters in the UV completion of the EFT. We illustrate this using examples of leptoquark UV completions. Finally, we comment on the possibility to probe CP-conserving new physics via the D parameter.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.