Paper detail

On the Security of Wang's Provably Secure Identity-based Key Agreement Protocol

In a 2005 IACR report, Wang published an efficient identity-based key agreement protocol (IDAK) suitable for resource constrained devices. The author shows that the IDAK key agreement protocol is secure in the Bellare-Rogaway model with random oracles and also provides separate ad-hoc security proofs claiming that the IDAK protocol is not vulnerable to Key Compromise Impersonation attacks and also enjoys Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS). In this report, we review the security properties of the protocol and point out that it is vulnerable to Unknown Key Share attacks. Although such attacks are often difficult to setup in a real world environment they are nevertheless interesting from a theoretical point of view so we provide a version of the protocol that fixes the problem in a standard way. We also provide a security proof of the IDAK protocol based on the Gap Bilinear Diffie Hellman and random oracle assumptions in the stronger extended Canetti-Krawczyk security model of distributed computing.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.