Paper detail

On the Scalability of Reliable Data Transfer in High Speed Networks

This paper considers reliable data transfer in a high-speed network (HSN) in which the per-connection capacity is very large. We focus on sliding window protocols employing selective repeat for reliable data transfer and study two reliability mechanisms based on ARQ and FEC. The question we ask is which mechanism is more suitable for an HSN in which the scalability of reliable data transfer in terms of receiver's buffer requirement and achievable delay and throughput is a concern. To efficiently utilize the large bandwidth available to a connection in an HSN, sliding window protocols require a large transmission window. In this regime of large transmission windows, we show that while both mechanisms achieve the same asymptotic throughput in the presence of packet losses, their delay and buffer requirements are different. Specifically, an FEC-based mechanism has delay and receiver's buffer requirement that are asymptotically smaller than that of an ARQ-based selective repeat mechanism by a factor of log W, where W is the window size of the selective repeat mechanism. This result is then used to investigate the implications of each reliability mechanism on protocol design in an HSN in terms of throughput, delay, buffer requirement, and control overhead.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.