On the Satisfiability of Quantum Circuits of Small Treewidth

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

It has been known for almost three decades that many NP\mathrm{NP}-hard optimization problems can be solved in polynomial time when restricted to structures of constant treewidth. In this work we provide the first extension of such results to the quantum setting. We show that given a quantum circuit CC with nn uninitialized inputs, poly(n)\mathit{poly}(n) gates, and treewidth tt, one can compute in time (nδ)exp⁡(O(t))(\frac{n}δ)^{\exp(O(t))} a classical assignment y∈{0,1}ny\in \{0,1\}^n that maximizes the acceptance probability of CC up to a δδ additive factor. In particular, our algorithm runs in polynomial time if tt is constant and 1/poly(n)<δ<11/poly(n) < δ< 1. For unrestricted values of tt, this problem is known to be complete for the complexity class QCMA\mathrm{QCMA}, a quantum generalization of MA. In contrast, we show that the same problem is NP\mathrm{NP}-complete if t=O(log⁡n)t=O(\log n) even when δδ is constant. On the other hand, we show that given a nn-input quantum circuit CC of treewidth t=O(log⁡n)t=O(\log n), and a constant δ<1/2δ<1/2, it is QMA\mathrm{QMA}-complete to determine whether there exists a quantum state ∣ ⁣φ⟩∈(Cd)⊗n\mid\!φ\rangle \in (\mathbb{C}^d)^{\otimes n} such that the acceptance probability of C∣ ⁣φ⟩C\mid\!φ\rangle is greater than 1−δ1-δ, or whether for every such state ∣ ⁣φ⟩\mid\!φ\rangle, the acceptance probability of C∣ ⁣φ⟩C\mid\!φ\rangle is less than δδ. As a consequence, under the widely believed assumption that QMA≠NP\mathrm{QMA} \neq \mathrm{NP}, we have that quantum witnesses are strictly more powerful than classical witnesses with respect to Merlin-Arthur protocols in which the verifier is a quantum circuit of logarithmic treewidth.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.