Paper detail

On the role of the Ky Fan metric in rough ideal convergence in probability

Given a probability space $(S,Δ, \mathbb{P})$ and a separable metric space $(U,d)$, the $Ky~Fan$ metric $ρ(X,Y)$ on the space $\mathfrak{X}^0$ of equivalence classes of random variables (w.r.t. almost sure equality) formed from the set $\mathfrak{X}(U)$ of $U$-valued random variables is given by $ρ(X,Y)=\inf \{\varepsilon>0:\mathbb{P}(d(X,Y)>\varepsilon)\leq\varepsilon\}.$ In this article, we primarily introduce the concept of rough ideal convergence in probability which serves as a unifying generalization of both ideal convergence of sequences in metric spaces and convergence of random variables in probability. We demonstrate that the rough ideal limit set is closed and bounded w.r.t. the $Ky~Fan$ metric $ρ$, and that, for a certain class of ideals, it forms an $F_{σδ}$ subset of $\mathfrak{X}^0$. In this process, we present the key concepts of strong and weak rough ideal cluster points in probability. It turns out that the set of strong rough ideal cluster points in probability is always closed, whereas the weak set is conditionally closed in the metric space ($\mathfrak{X}^0,ρ)$. Finally, we obtain a characterization of a maximal admissible ideal in terms of the sets of strong rough ideal cluster points and the rough ideal limit set in probability.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.