Paper detail

On the role of the H2 ortho:para ratio in gravitational collapse during star formation

Hydrogen molecules (H2) come in two forms in the interstellar medium, ortho- and para-hydrogen, corresponding to the two different spin configurations of the two hydrogen atoms. The relative abundances of the two flavours in the interstellar medium are still very uncertain, and this abundance ratio has a significant impact on the thermal properties of the gas. In the context of star formation, theoretical studies have recently adopted two different strategies when considering the ortho:para ratio (OPR) of H2 molecules; the first considers the OPR to be frozen at 3:1 while the second assumes that the species are in thermal equilibrium. As the OPR potentially affects the protostellar cores which form as a result of the gravitational collapse of a dense molecular cloud, the aim of this paper is to quantify precisely what role the choice of OPR plays in the properties and evolution of the cores. We used two different ideal gas equations of state for a hydrogen and helium mix in a radiation hydrodynamics code to simulate the collapse of a dense cloud and the formation of the first and second Larson cores; the first equation of state uses a fixed OPR of 3:1 while the second assumes thermal equilibrium. Simulations using an equilibrium ratio collapse faster at early times and show noticeable oscillations around hydrostatic equilibrium, to the point where the core expands for a short time right after its formation before resuming its contraction. In the case of a fixed 3:1 OPR, the core's evolution is a lot smoother. The OPR was however found to have little impact on the size, mass and radius of the two Larson cores. We conclude that if one is solely interested in the final properties of the cores when they are formed, it does not matter which OPR is used. On the other hand, if one's focus lies primarily in the evolution of the first core, the choice of OPR becomes important.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.