Paper detail

On the Role of Feedback in LT Codes

This paper concerns application of feedback in LT codes. The considered type of feedback is acknowledgments, where information on which symbols have been decoded is given to the transmitter. We identify an important adaptive mechanism in standard LT codes, which is crucial to their ability to perform well under any channel conditions. We show how precipitate application of acknowledgments can interfere with this adaptive mechanism and lead to significant performance degradation. Moreover, our analysis reveals that even sensible use of acknowledgments has very low potential in standard LT codes. Motivated by this, we analyze the impact of acknowledgments on multi layer LT codes, i.e. LT codes with unequal error protection. In this case, feedback proves advantageous. We show that by using only a single feedback message, it is possible to achieve a noticeable performance improvement compared to standard LT codes.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.