Paper detail

On the robustness of random k-cores

The k-core of a graph is its maximal subgraph with minimum degree at least k. In this paper, we address robustness questions about k-cores. Given a k-core, remove one edge uniformly at random and find its new k-core. We are interested in how many vertices are deleted from the original k-core to find the new one. This can be seem as a measure of robustness of the original k-core. We prove that, if the initial k-core is chosen uniformly at random from the k-cores with n vertices and m edges, its robustness depends essentially on its average degree c. We prove that, if c converges to k, then the new k-core is empty with probability 1+o(1). We define a constant c(k)&#39; such that when k+epsilon < c < c(k)&#39;- epsilon, the new k-core is empty with probability bounded away from zero and, if c > c(k)&#39;+ psi with psi = omega(n^{-1/4}), psi(n) > 0 and c is bounded, then the probability that the new k-core has less than n-h(n) vertices goes to zero, for every h(n) = omega(1/psi).

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.