Paper detail

On the Reynolds analogy for high-speed rough-wall flows: implications for wall modelling

We study the validity of the generalized Reynolds analogy (GRA) in compressible turbulent boundary layers over prism-shaped roughness by mining direct numerical simulation data of Mach 2 and Mach 4 compressible turbulent boundary layers with adiabatic and cooled surfaces. Although the direct influence of roughness strongly disrupts the near-wall coupling between momentum and energy, we show that this breakdown is confined to the roughness sublayer. Above this layer, the enthalpy and velocity fields recover a smooth-wall-like similarity, and the GRA becomes asymptotically valid by naturally accounting for roughness-enhanced wall shear stress and heat flux. Building on these results, we propose a GRA-based wall model for predicting heat transfer over rough surfaces, which is coupled with a drag-predictive physics-based method developed for prism-shaped roughness by means of compressibility transformations.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.