Paper detail

On the resilience of helical magnetic fields to turbulent diffusion and the astrophysical implications

The extent to which large scale magnetic fields are susceptible to turbulent diffusion is important for interpreting the need for in situ large scale dynamos in astrophysics and for observationally inferring field strengths compared to kinetic energy. By solving coupled equations for magnetic energy and magnetic helicity in a system initiated with isotropic turbulence and an arbitrarily helical large scale field, we quantify the decay rate of the latter for a bounded or periodic system. The energy associated with the non-helical magnetic field rapidly decays by turbulent diffusion, but the decay rate of the helical component depends on whether the ratio of its magnetic energy to the turbulent kinetic energy exceeds a critical value given by M_{1,c} =(k_1/k_2)^2, where k_1 and k_2 are the wave numbers of the large and forcing scales. Turbulently diffusing helical fields to small scales while conserving magnetic helicity requires a rapid increase in total magnetic energy. As such, only when the helical fields are sub-critical can they so diffuse. When super-critical, the large scale helical field decays slowly, at a rate determined by microphysical dissipation even when macroscopic turbulence is present. Amplification of small scale magnetic helicity abates the turbulent diffusion. Two implications are that: (1) Standard arguments supporting the need for in situ large scale dynamos based on the otherwise rapid turbulent diffusion of large scale fields require re-thinking since only the non-helical field is so diffused in a closed system. Boundary terms could however provide potential pathways for rapid change of the large scale helical field. (2) Since M_{1,c} <<1 for k_1 << k_2, the presence of long-lived ordered large scale helical fields, as in extragalactic jets, does not guarantee that the magnetic field dominates the kinetic energy.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.