Paper detail

On the remainder of the semialgebraic Stone-Cěch compactification of a semialgebraic set

In this work we analyze some topological properties of the remainder $\partial M:=β_s^* M\setminus M$ of the semialgebraic Stone-Cěch compactification $β_s^* M$ of a semialgebraic set $M\subset{\mathbb R}^m$ in order to `distinguish' its points from those of $M$. To that end we prove that the set of points of $β_s^* M$ that admit a metrizable neighborhood in $β_s^* M$ equals $M_{\rm lc}\cup( {\rm Cl}_{β_s^* M}(\overline{M}_{\leq1})\setminus\overline{M}_{\leq1})$ where $M_{\rm lc}$ is the largest locally compact dense subset of $M$ and $\overline{M}_{\leq1}$ is the closure in $M$ of the set of $1$-dimensional points of $M$. In addition, we analyze the properties of the sets $\widehat{\partial}M$ and $\widetilde{\partial}M$ of free maximal ideals associated with formal and semialgebraic paths. We prove that both are dense subsets of the remainder $\partial M$ and that the differences $\partial M\setminus\widehat{\partial}M$ and $\widehat{\partial} M\setminus\widetilde{\partial}M$ are also dense subsets of $\partial M$. It holds moreover that all the points of $\widehat{\partial}M$ have countable systems of neighborhoods in $β_s^* M$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.