Paper detail

On the relative role of the physical mechanisms on complex biodamage induced by carbon irradiation

The effective use of swift ion beams in cancer treatment (known as hadrontherapy) as well as an appropriate protection in manned space missions rely on the accurate understanding of energy delivery to cells damaging their genetic information. The key ingredient characterizing the response of a medium to the perturbation induced by charged particles is its electronic excitation spectrum. By using linear response time-dependent density functional theory, we obtain the energy and momentum transfer excitation spectrum (the energy-loss function, ELF) of liquid water (main constituent of biological tissues), in excellent agreement with experimental data. The inelastic scattering cross sections obtained from this ELF, together with the elastic scattering cross sections derived considering the condensed phase nature of the medium, are used to perform accurate Monte Carlo simulations of the energy deposited by swift carbon ions in liquid water and carried away by the generated secondary electrons producing inelastic events (ionization, excitation, and dissociation electron attachment, DEA), strongly correlated with cellular death, which are scored in sensitive volumes having the size of two DNA convolutions. The sizes of clusters of damaging events for a wide range of carbon ion energies, from those relevant to hadrontherapy up to cosmic radiation, predict with unprecedented statistical accuracy the nature and relative magnitude of the main inelastic processes contributing to radiation biodamage, confirming that ionization accounts for the vast majority of complex damage. DEA, typically regarded as a very relevant biodamage mechanism, surprisingly plays a minor role in carbon-ion induced clusters of harmful events.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.