Paper detail

On the relative Contribution of high-redshift Galaxies and Active Galactic Nuclei to Reionization

In this paper we discuss the contribution of different astrophysical sources to the ionization of neutral hydrogen at different redshifts. We critically revise the arguments in favour/against a substantial contribution of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) and/or Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) to the reionization of the Universe at z>5. We consider extrapolations of the high-z QSO and LBG luminosity functions and their redshift evolution as well as indirect constraints on the space density of lower luminosity Active Galactic Nuclei based on the galaxy stellar mass function. Since the hypothesis of a reionization due to LBGs alone requires a significant contribution of faint dwarf galaxies and a LyC photon escape fraction (f_esc) of the order of ~20%, in tension with present observational constraints, we examine under which hypothesis AGNs and LBGs may provide a combined relevant contribution to the reionization. We show that a relatively steep faint-end of the AGN luminosity function, consistent with present constraints, provides a relevant (although sub-dominant) contribution, thus allowing us to recover the required ionizing photon rates with f_esc~5% up to z~7. At higher redshifts, we test the case for a luminosity-dependent f_esc scenario and we conclude that, if the observed LBGs are indeed characterized by very low f_esc, values of the order of f_esc~70% are needed for objects below our detection threshold, for this galaxy population to provide a substantial contribution to reionization. Clearly, the study of the properties of faint sources (both AGNs and LBGs) is crucial.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.